Saxony
Donkey Kong
   
Posts: 742
My avatar is from the anime "Pani Poni Dash!".
|
 |
« Reply #200 on: October 07, 2010, 11:16:05 PM » |
|
Q78. Is there any restriction in Warshaper's Morphic Weapons? Could my Changeling, for instance, get 10 free tentacles?
Yes, it is rather broken when using that interpretation. Most people just assume it is limited to one natural weapon for the sake of sanity. By yes, she means no. There is no restriction.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
If I say something about real world physics, and someone disagrees, assume I am right 90% of the time. This number goes up to 100% if I am late night posting - trust me, my star dust sibs.
|
|
|
|
Bozwevial
|
 |
« Reply #201 on: October 07, 2010, 11:20:51 PM » |
|
By yes, she means no.
That explains so much about my life.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
saethone
Ring-Tailed Lemur
 
Posts: 80
|
 |
« Reply #202 on: October 07, 2010, 11:23:59 PM » |
|
By yes, she means no.
That explains so much about my life. Lets hope this is an isolated case 
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
snakeman830
|
 |
« Reply #203 on: October 07, 2010, 11:28:41 PM » |
|
By yes, she means no.
That explains so much about my life. Permission to sig?
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
I am constantly amazed by how many DM's ban Tomb of Battle. The book doesn't even exist! Quotes: By yes, she means no.
That explains so much about my life. hiicantcomeupwithacharacterthatisntaghostwhyisthatamijustretardedorsomething
Why would you even do this? It hurts my eyes and looks like you ate your keyboard before suffering an attack of explosive diarrhea. If using Genesis to hide your phylactry, set it at -300 degrees farenheit. See how do-gooders fare with a liquid atmosphere.
|
|
|
|
Bozwevial
|
 |
« Reply #204 on: October 07, 2010, 11:47:28 PM » |
|
By yes, she means no.
That explains so much about my life. Permission to sig? Granted, though I had hoped for a more noble reason. 
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
PhaedrusXY
|
 |
« Reply #205 on: October 08, 2010, 12:03:38 AM » |
|
or you can have a shrunk basket you wear as a hat. set to certain contingencys.. for instant 100% concelment  Look at the equipment section of this character sheet. I have one. 
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
A couple of water benders, a dike, a flaming arrow, and a few barrels of blasting jelly?
Sounds like the makings of a gay porn film.
...thanks
|
|
|
|
X-Codes
|
 |
« Reply #206 on: October 08, 2010, 12:46:16 AM » |
|
Use it to power an energy transformation field?
What's the familiar?
Coure Eladrin
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
BeholderSlayer
|
 |
« Reply #207 on: October 08, 2010, 10:54:47 AM » |
|
Q79: The spell Exalted Raiment from BoED states in the list that it makes you immune to CON damage and drain, but in the spell description changes that to reducing ability damage from spellcasting by 1, to a minimum of 1, what gives with that? Did they just decide the list version was a bad idea?
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
carnivore
|
 |
« Reply #208 on: October 08, 2010, 12:30:52 PM » |
|
A79yes , Text Trumps .... it is mainly refering to casting Sanctified Spells(Sacrifice(attribute Damage)) 
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Emo_Duck
Domesticated Capuchin Monkey
 
Posts: 99
|
 |
« Reply #209 on: October 08, 2010, 04:00:58 PM » |
|
Q80:Looking at the SRD entries, the Permanency spell and the Incarnate power both have a definite list of spells/powers they can be used with. Are there any guidelines for using these with spells/powers not printed in the SRD? Or is it just generally assumed that they only work with the spells/powers provided in those tables?
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
TC X0 Lt 0X
Barbary Macaque at the Rock of Gibraltar
  
Posts: 192
|
 |
« Reply #210 on: October 08, 2010, 04:03:17 PM » |
|
Q81 Does the Urban Companion Alternate Class Feature of the Druid Qualify for Improved Familiar Feat, as it is described as being identical to the Sorcerer's Summon Familiar Class Feature?
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
"Never beg, you earn, by winning, or else you won't get anything..."
|
|
|
|
jameswilliamogle
|
 |
« Reply #211 on: October 08, 2010, 04:04:40 PM » |
|
A80: Its totally a DM call as to what they'll allow and not allow (its been that way since 1st edition). The examples in the SRD are ones that specifically do work.
Q82: Are there any good abuses for the Racial Emulation feat from Races of Eberron, or is it a dud?
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
Bozwevial
|
 |
« Reply #212 on: October 08, 2010, 04:10:19 PM » |
|
A82: Unless the ability to take on subtypes opens anything up, it's nothing a UMD check couldn't fix.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
TC X0 Lt 0X
Barbary Macaque at the Rock of Gibraltar
  
Posts: 192
|
 |
« Reply #213 on: October 08, 2010, 04:11:40 PM » |
|
A82 You can use it to qualify for Racial Feats and Prestige Classes. The first that comes to mind is a Shadowcraft Mage.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
"Never beg, you earn, by winning, or else you won't get anything..."
|
|
|
|
Bozwevial
|
 |
« Reply #214 on: October 08, 2010, 04:13:24 PM » |
|
A82 You can use it to qualify for Racial Feats and Prestige Classes. The first that comes to mind is a Shadowcraft Mage.
You lose the benefits once you change back, though.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
TC X0 Lt 0X
Barbary Macaque at the Rock of Gibraltar
  
Posts: 192
|
 |
« Reply #215 on: October 08, 2010, 04:17:40 PM » |
|
A82 You can use it to qualify for Racial Feats and Prestige Classes. The first that comes to mind is a Shadowcraft Mage.
You lose the benefits once you change back, though. True.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
"Never beg, you earn, by winning, or else you won't get anything..."
|
|
|
|
Benly
|
 |
« Reply #216 on: October 08, 2010, 06:16:57 PM » |
|
A82: Unless the ability to take on subtypes opens anything up, it's nothing a UMD check couldn't fix.
It would if there were any humanoids with interesting subtypes published, but there aren't. About the best you can manage is (Aquatic) to move in water without Swim checks. If your DM allows third-party supplements that have humanoids with incorporeal, swarm, fire, cold, or even just the alignment subtypes things suddenly get more interesting to one degree or another, but as it stands there's not much.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
McPoyo
|
 |
« Reply #217 on: October 08, 2010, 06:32:39 PM » |
|
A82: Unless the ability to take on subtypes opens anything up, it's nothing a UMD check couldn't fix.
It would if there were any humanoids with interesting subtypes published, but there aren't. About the best you can manage is (Aquatic) to move in water without Swim checks. If your DM allows third-party supplements that have humanoids with incorporeal, swarm, fire, cold, or even just the alignment subtypes things suddenly get more interesting to one degree or another, but as it stands there's not much. FoP anyone? 
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
A gygaxian dungeon is like the world's most messed up game show.
Behind door number one: INSTANT DEATH! Behind door number 2: A magic crown! Behind door number 3: 4d6 giant bees, and THREE HUNDRED POUNDS OF HONEY! They don't/haven't, was the point. 3.5 is as dead as people not liking nice tits.
Sometimes, their tits (3.5) get enhancements (houserules), but that doesn't mean people don't like nice tits.
Though sometimes, the surgeon (DM) botches them pretty bad...
Best metaphor I have seen in a long time. I give you much fu. Three Errata for the Mage-kings under the sky, Seven for the Barbarian-lords in their halls of stone, Nine for Mortal Monks doomed to die, One for the Wizard on his dark throne In the Land of Charop where the Shadows lie.
|
|
|
|
BeholderSlayer
|
 |
« Reply #218 on: October 08, 2010, 06:35:02 PM » |
|
Q83: Can anybody think of a non-living construct that lacks magic immunity but is still immune to ability damage and fatigue?
Q84: Is the extra d4 damage dice from Arcane strike and the bonus damage from Arcane Boost applied to critical hits?
|
|
|
|
« Last Edit: October 08, 2010, 06:46:03 PM by BeholderSlayer »
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
wotmaniac
|
 |
« Reply #219 on: October 08, 2010, 06:56:00 PM » |
|
Q83: Can anybody think of a non-living construct that lacks magic immunity but is still immune to ability damage and fatigue?
A83 unless there are some exceptions that I cannot think of at the moment, then all constructs are immune to ability damage and fatigue. so, to answer your question ... any construct that is not a "golem". (though there might be some non-golem constructs that are also immune to magic; but that would be the exception, not the rule) Just from the SRD: - Animated Object - Demon, Retriever - Homunculus - Inevitable -- have SR - Shield Guardian and there are many others sprinkled throughout the various MM's, etc. Q84: Is the extra d4 damage dice from Arcane strike and the bonus damage from Arcane Boost applied to critical hits?
- arcane strike = no. extra damage that is determined by rolling extra dice is not effected by critical hits (via Rules Compendium) - arcane boost = yes (I think). this is static damage, and therefore subject to multiplying from critical hits. (unless there is something of which I am unaware)
|
|
|
|
« Last Edit: October 08, 2010, 07:16:36 PM by wotmaniac »
|
Logged
|
 If you stop ignoring 289 pages telling what the intent is to stretch "more power" in your own god complexion of your interpretation trumps all to cover ability adjustments from aging then I will ignore a quarter page of rules that exist within a sidebar.
I think in this case the grammar is less important than whether the Str and Dex bonus provided to your created undead scales.
Greenbound Summoning RAIExpanded GestaltMore Savage ProgressionsReport any wrongs I have done here.
|
|
|
|