|
The_Mad_Linguist
|
 |
« Reply #360 on: April 25, 2010, 05:04:09 PM » |
|
or craft contingent spell for a no-action teleport; keyed to when you say "FUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUCK"
Oops! Somebody cast silence under you! I speak drow sign language. |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
Anklebite
|
|
« Reply #361 on: April 25, 2010, 05:11:27 PM » |
|
or craft contingent spell for a no-action teleport; keyed to when you say "FUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUCK"
Oops! Somebody cast silence under you! I speak drow sign language. my other contingency goes off when I cross my toes. another one goes off when I try to speak, but am silenced. |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
I do not suffer from paranoia; I enjoy every second of it.
Pioneer of the Ultimate Magus + Sublime Chord + Ultimate Magus combo
|
|
|
Vicerious
Barbary Macaque at the Rock of Gibraltar
Posts: 153
Foolish Mortal
|
|
« Reply #362 on: April 25, 2010, 07:54:28 PM » |
|
or craft contingent spell for a no-action teleport; keyed to when you say "FUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUCK"
Oops! Somebody cast silence under you! No one ever said the contingency needs to hear you. |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
"A witty saying proves nothing." --Voltaire
|
|
|
Suzerain
Bi-Curious George
Posts: 523
is on extended leave
|
|
« Reply #363 on: April 25, 2010, 07:56:03 PM » |
|
Q79
Is there anything stating specifically that constructs cannot die from old age, or are immune to aging effects? I mean... my toaster broke down after 10 years of use. So could a golem. Or couldn't it.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
McPoyo
|
|
« Reply #364 on: April 25, 2010, 08:28:31 PM » |
|
Q79
Is there anything stating specifically that constructs cannot die from old age, or are immune to aging effects? I mean... my toaster broke down after 10 years of use. So could a golem. Or couldn't it.
Your toaster isn't magical. |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
A gygaxian dungeon is like the world's most messed up game show.
Behind door number one: INSTANT DEATH!
Behind door number 2: A magic crown!
Behind door number 3: 4d6 giant bees, and THREE HUNDRED POUNDS OF HONEY! They don't/haven't, was the point. 3.5 is as dead as people not liking nice tits.
Sometimes, their tits (3.5) get enhancements (houserules), but that doesn't mean people don't like nice tits.
Though sometimes, the surgeon (DM) botches them pretty bad...
Best metaphor I have seen in a long time. I give you much fu. Three Errata for the Mage-kings under the sky,
Seven for the Barbarian-lords in their halls of stone,
Nine for Mortal Monks doomed to die,
One for the Wizard on his dark throne
In the Land of Charop where the Shadows lie. |
|
|
|
weenog
|
|
« Reply #365 on: April 25, 2010, 08:38:17 PM » |
|
Q79
Is there anything stating specifically that constructs cannot die from old age, or are immune to aging effects? I mean... my toaster broke down after 10 years of use. So could a golem. Or couldn't it.
Isn't the more pertinent question, "Is there anything stating something happens when a construct reaches a certain age?" Warforged explicitly feel certain effects from the passage of time, I think a thousand year old golem is just a golem that's seen a thousand years worth of things and can't remember any of it. |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
"We managed to make an NPC puke an undead monster."
"That sounds like a victory to me."
|
|
|
Suzerain
Bi-Curious George
Posts: 523
is on extended leave
|
|
« Reply #366 on: April 25, 2010, 09:03:38 PM » |
|
Q79
Is there anything stating specifically that constructs cannot die from old age, or are immune to aging effects? I mean... my toaster broke down after 10 years of use. So could a golem. Or couldn't it.
Isn't the more pertinent question, "Is there anything stating something happens when a construct reaches a certain age?" "Is there anything stating I can't act while dead?" I was just trying to get as close to a official statement as possible. I know constructs don't suddenly break down. Nor do magic items. And I would rule sensibly on these issues as a DM. However, I think it's kinda stupid it's never stated, anywhere. |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
Fluffles
|
|
« Reply #367 on: April 25, 2010, 09:47:15 PM » |
|
Q80
What's the easies way to become immune to dazing? (Not for celerity abuse, but avoid Arcane Fusion [True Strike + Spellwarped Wings of Fluffy] abuse :-\)
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
Negative Zero
|
|
« Reply #368 on: April 25, 2010, 09:52:11 PM » |
|
Q80
What's the easies way to become immune to dazing? (Not for celerity abuse, but avoid Arcane Fusion [True Strike + Spellwarped Wings of Fluffy] abuse :-\)
Favor of the Martyr (SpC) or Mark of the Dauntless (ECS?). |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
McPoyo
|
|
« Reply #369 on: April 25, 2010, 10:16:25 PM » |
|
Q80
What's the easies way to become immune to dazing? (Not for celerity abuse, but avoid Arcane Fusion [True Strike + Spellwarped Wings of Fluffy] abuse :-\)
Favor of the Martyr (SpC) or Mark of the Dauntless (ECS?). Aren't constructs immune? Or undead? Something as a type is immune, isn't it? |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
A gygaxian dungeon is like the world's most messed up game show.
Behind door number one: INSTANT DEATH!
Behind door number 2: A magic crown!
Behind door number 3: 4d6 giant bees, and THREE HUNDRED POUNDS OF HONEY! They don't/haven't, was the point. 3.5 is as dead as people not liking nice tits.
Sometimes, their tits (3.5) get enhancements (houserules), but that doesn't mean people don't like nice tits.
Though sometimes, the surgeon (DM) botches them pretty bad...
Best metaphor I have seen in a long time. I give you much fu. Three Errata for the Mage-kings under the sky,
Seven for the Barbarian-lords in their halls of stone,
Nine for Mortal Monks doomed to die,
One for the Wizard on his dark throne
In the Land of Charop where the Shadows lie. |
|
|
|
Fluffles
|
|
« Reply #370 on: April 25, 2010, 10:31:22 PM » |
|
Q80
What's the easies way to become immune to dazing? (Not for celerity abuse, but avoid Arcane Fusion [True Strike + Spellwarped Wings of Fluffy] abuse :-\)
Favor of the Martyr (SpC) or Mark of the Dauntless (ECS?). I'm not a paladin, but I'll check out Mark of the Dauntless. Nope. Just stunning. |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
Fluffles
|
|
« Reply #371 on: April 25, 2010, 10:45:38 PM » |
|
Follow up to Q80:
Q81:
What constitutes a "True Dragonmark?"
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
Surreal
|
|
« Reply #372 on: April 25, 2010, 10:56:27 PM » |
|
Q 82: How exactly do I go about optimizing this?
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
--- "The late, sedate, and no to great." ~SurrealSome Handy Links for CO Work (WotC 339 version) - a compilation of links for base/prestige class handbooks, tactics, spellcasting, character builds, D&D databases, etc. Archived version of the above with working linksThe Mango Index - a giant index for all things D&D and where to find them The Mango List Reborn! - rehosted by KellKheraptis Lists of Stuff - listing of class features etc and how to get them, etc. sort of like above but a little more specific and sorted by category Polymorph, Wildshape and Shapechange, oh my! (comparison charts) - side-by-side comparison of all the various form altering abilities Alternative Class Featuresalternative ways to get class skills |
|
|
|
Anklebite
|
|
« Reply #373 on: April 25, 2010, 11:00:41 PM » |
|
Q 82: How exactly do I go about optimizing this? bear warrior and wild cohort(heavy warhorse). use blackbear form. take mounted charge feats. |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
I do not suffer from paranoia; I enjoy every second of it.
Pioneer of the Ultimate Magus + Sublime Chord + Ultimate Magus combo
|
|
|
|
The_Mad_Linguist
|
|
« Reply #374 on: April 25, 2010, 11:24:57 PM » |
|
Mortalbane defines mortals as "not undead, outsiders, or constructs", IIRC. Follow up to Q80:
Q81:
What constitutes a "True Dragonmark?"
A dragonmark with age categorone that isn't aberrant. |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Suzerain
Bi-Curious George
Posts: 523
is on extended leave
|
|
« Reply #375 on: April 25, 2010, 11:30:21 PM » |
|
Mortalbane defines mortals as "not undead, outsiders, or constructs", IIRC. Thanks for this. Excludes Elementals, however. How rude. |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
Anklebite
|
|
« Reply #376 on: April 25, 2010, 11:33:39 PM » |
|
Mortalbane defines mortals as "not undead, outsiders, or constructs", IIRC. Thanks for this. Excludes Elementals, however. How rude. does extraplanar count? |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
I do not suffer from paranoia; I enjoy every second of it.
Pioneer of the Ultimate Magus + Sublime Chord + Ultimate Magus combo
|
|
|
Suzerain
Bi-Curious George
Posts: 523
is on extended leave
|
|
« Reply #377 on: April 25, 2010, 11:48:28 PM » |
|
Mortalbane defines mortals as "not undead, outsiders, or constructs", IIRC. Thanks for this. Excludes Elementals, however. How rude. does extraplanar count? I don't think so. Neraphim are extraplanar, but only live 450 years max. And constructs and undead aren't necessarily extraplanar. |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
Anklebite
|
|
« Reply #378 on: April 25, 2010, 11:50:13 PM » |
|
Mortalbane defines mortals as "not undead, outsiders, or constructs", IIRC. Thanks for this. Excludes Elementals, however. How rude. does extraplanar count? I don't think so. Neraphim are extraplanar, but only live 450 years max. And constructs and undead aren't necessarily extraplanar. aren't neraphim outsiders? but yeah, kinda silly how mortalbane would affect an earth elemental. |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
I do not suffer from paranoia; I enjoy every second of it.
Pioneer of the Ultimate Magus + Sublime Chord + Ultimate Magus combo
|
|
|
Suzerain
Bi-Curious George
Posts: 523
is on extended leave
|
|
« Reply #379 on: April 25, 2010, 11:55:49 PM » |
|
aren't neraphim outsiders?
but yeah, kinda silly how mortalbane would affect an earth elemental.
They are. Real outsiders, even. Though I guess they're more mortal-like, so I can understand why they are destined to die. Well, the "Errata" to BoVD is basically one Q&A thread on Monte Cook's forum somewhere. We could look there to see if he has any justification for this ridiculousness. edit: Found the thread: http://okayyourturn.yuku.com/topic/6197/t/BoVD-Questions.html |
|
|
|
« Last Edit: April 26, 2010, 12:04:08 AM by Suzerain »
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
