|
Takanaki
|
 |
« Reply #60 on: November 20, 2009, 01:06:36 PM » |
|
I'm AFB so I can't be sure, but I could swear the fractional BAB/Saves table is either on the same page as, or one page removed from, the alternate armor rules. At least, my brain is coming up with that picture of the guy with the arrows/bolts bouncing off his armor.
It's in the UA Gestalt section. |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
ksbsnowowl
|
|
« Reply #61 on: November 20, 2009, 04:02:05 PM » |
|
Aye, it is in the same section as the Gestalt rules (thus the former arguments that the two were supposed to be used together, back when UA first came out.)
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
kalaskaagathas
Bi-Curious George
Posts: 369
"Seek Perfection of Character" - Gichin Funakoshi
|
|
« Reply #62 on: November 20, 2009, 04:50:32 PM » |
|
Q 18: The text for the feat 'Sword of the Arcane Order' includes the following:
If you also have levels in wizard, your wizard caster level is treated as the sum of your wizard, paladin, and ranger class levels.
If I'm a Wizard 1/Ranger19 what are my spells per day and what is the highest level of spells that I have slots for?
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
Philosophers often behave like little children who scribble some marks on a piece of paper at random and then ask the grown-up "What's that?" — It happened like this: the grown-up had drawn pictures for the child several times and said "this is a man," "this is a house," etc. And then the child makes some marks too and asks: what's this then? - Wittgenstein Just call me KA. Brainstorming Thread for a Psionic Tricks Handbook (WIP!) |
|
|
|
archangel.arcanis
|
|
« Reply #63 on: November 20, 2009, 04:53:40 PM » |
|
your spells per day are as a 1st level wizard. Obviously this would make them all 1st level spells. When you cast any of those spells you would be treated as a 20th level caster, thus making them last longer and harder to dispel along with increased effect up to the cap set on them.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
Clerics and Druids are like the 4 and 2 in 42. Together they are the answer to the ultimate question in D&D.
Retire the character before the DM smacks you with the Table as the book will feel totally inadequate now.-Hazren
|
|
|
kalaskaagathas
Bi-Curious George
Posts: 369
"Seek Perfection of Character" - Gichin Funakoshi
|
|
« Reply #64 on: November 20, 2009, 04:55:15 PM » |
|
That's what I thought, thanks.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
Philosophers often behave like little children who scribble some marks on a piece of paper at random and then ask the grown-up "What's that?" — It happened like this: the grown-up had drawn pictures for the child several times and said "this is a man," "this is a house," etc. And then the child makes some marks too and asks: what's this then? - Wittgenstein Just call me KA. Brainstorming Thread for a Psionic Tricks Handbook (WIP!) |
|
|
|
ksbsnowowl
|
|
« Reply #65 on: November 20, 2009, 04:59:12 PM » |
|
A 18b:Although you would not have gotten the spells in your spellbook for free (you would have to have compiled it from scrolls or other spellbooks), you could cast up to 4th level wizard spells in your Ranger spell slots (however, in this case they would use your ranger caster level [I'm pretty sure], which would be CL 9).
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
winter_soldier
Domesticated Capuchin Monkey
Posts: 122
|
|
« Reply #66 on: November 20, 2009, 05:18:36 PM » |
|
Q19A: What kind of slot would a minor or major iceheart (from Frostburn) take up.....is it slotless like a Nightstick?
Q19B: When making a higher-level character that has a PRC that requires the creation of an item (like the Winterbourne of Igborihu), does the full item GP value apply for purposes of character wealth, or is it half GP?
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
Chemus
|
|
« Reply #67 on: November 20, 2009, 09:53:19 PM » |
|
Q12 I'm looking to get the domain power from a particular domain (kobold) without being a cleric, and without PrC's. I thought I saw a discussion on how to do this via a feat (without using Planar Touchstone: Catalogues of Enlightenment from the PlH), but I can't find it now (google, etc) Can anyone help?
A12 : Either take the Sorcerer ACF to snag a domain power, or the Wizard ACF to snag a domain power. Can't remember when sorcs get it, but wizzy gets it at 5th. Thank you. Are we sure there's no feat somewhere that grants a domain power? |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
KellKheraptis
|
|
« Reply #68 on: November 20, 2009, 10:35:08 PM » |
|
Q12 I'm looking to get the domain power from a particular domain (kobold) without being a cleric, and without PrC's. I thought I saw a discussion on how to do this via a feat (without using Planar Touchstone: Catalogues of Enlightenment from the PlH), but I can't find it now (google, etc) Can anyone help?
Well, the one you specifically excluded from this exercise  There is also an epic feat, Extra Domain. A12 : Either take the Sorcerer ACF to snag a domain power, or the Wizard ACF to snag a domain power. Can't remember when sorcs get it, but wizzy gets it at 5th. Thank you. Are we sure there's no feat somewhere that grants a domain power? |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
Akalsaris
|
|
« Reply #69 on: November 21, 2009, 12:07:55 AM » |
|
A12: the Shape Soulmeld (Thieves' Gloves) feat + Open Least Chakra Magic of Incarnum: requires two feats and at least 6th level, but grants trap-finding, the same as the Kobold Domain does. Optimization resource: Trap-finding
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
Havok4
|
|
« Reply #70 on: November 21, 2009, 01:22:34 AM » |
|
A12: the Shape Soulmeld (Thieves' Gloves) feat + Open Least Chakra Magic of Incarnum: requires two feats and at least 6th level, but grants trap-finding, the same as the Kobold Domain does. Optimization resource: Trap-finding Or it effectively costs one feat and a spell slot with the open Chakra spells. |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
Chemus
|
|
« Reply #71 on: November 21, 2009, 01:52:30 AM » |
|
Thanks everyone. I guess should have said that I was looking for it for a 1st level warlock. It's not pivotal, but it's not available anyway, apparently. Great answers though.  |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
KellKheraptis
|
|
« Reply #72 on: November 21, 2009, 02:13:28 AM » |
|
Q20-A : Does anyone have an accessible link to the master spell list, and
Q20-B : Is there also a master power list?
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
slayn
Monkey bussiness
Posts: 4
|
|
« Reply #73 on: November 21, 2009, 08:39:56 AM » |
|
Q21 If I were to split ray a spell and quick cast true strike, would true affect both attacks of the spell?
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
OblivionSmurf83
|
|
« Reply #74 on: November 21, 2009, 09:17:57 AM » |
|
Q22 Does anyone know if there is any way for a Druid to share Wild Shape uses with his animal companion?
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
Runestar
|
|
« Reply #75 on: November 21, 2009, 09:49:42 AM » |
|
Q22 Does anyone know if there is any way for a Druid to share Wild Shape uses with his animal companion?
Heirophant's power of nature ability?  |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
A clear conscience is the surest sign of a failing memory.
|
|
|
|
OblivionSmurf83
|
|
« Reply #76 on: November 21, 2009, 09:52:51 AM » |
|
Thanks Runestar!
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
wotmaniac
|
|
« Reply #77 on: November 21, 2009, 10:18:48 AM » |
|
Q20-A : Does anyone have an accessible link to the master spell list, and
Q20-B : Is there also a master power list?
A20 - A http://www.crystalkeep.com/d20/index.phpA20 - B Not that I'm aware of. |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
 If you stop ignoring 289 pages telling what the intent is to stretch "more power" in your own god complexion of your interpretation trumps all to cover ability adjustments from aging then I will ignore a quarter page of rules that exist within a sidebar.
I think in this case the grammar is less important than whether the Str and Dex bonus provided to your created undead scales.
Greenbound Summoning RAIExpanded GestaltMore Savage ProgressionsReport any wrongs I have done here. |
|
|
|
Hitoshura
|
|
« Reply #78 on: November 21, 2009, 10:21:41 AM » |
|
Q23: Can Daring Outlaw be combined with Rogue's Fighter Feats variant?
Something Like Rogue 2 / Swashbuckler 3 / Guild Thief / Swashbuckler +12 would give Fighters shame o.o
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
CantripN
|
|
« Reply #79 on: November 21, 2009, 10:28:34 AM » |
|
Q23: Can Daring Outlaw be combined with Rogue's Fighter Feats variant?
Something Like Rogue 2 / Swashbuckler 3 / Guild Thief / Swashbuckler +12 would give Fighters shame o.o
A23: Interesting idea. RAI, yes, you'd get Fighter Bonus Feats. RAW, you'd get no SA nor anything else, though, since you gain SA as though you were a higher level Rogue; trouble is, even as a higher level rogue, you don't have any. I would expect most DMs to grant you Bonus Feats, though, but not SA. |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
Read, every day, something no one else is reading. Think, every day, something no one else is thinking. Do, every day, something no one else would be silly enough to do. It is bad for the mind to be always part of unanimity.
|
|
|
|
