http://brilliantgameologists.com
May 22, 2013, 02:14:24 PM *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
News: These boards are now READ ONLY. We've started over! So don't try posting here. Go here www.minmaxboards.com
 
   Home   Help Search Members Login Register  
Pages: « 1 2
  Print  
Author Topic: My Stupid House Rules - advice and feedback sought  (Read 1720 times)
0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
Judging Eagle
Domesticated Capuchin Monkey
**
Posts: 90


« Reply #20 on: October 03, 2008, 04:23:31 PM »

There's a lot of problems with what you said in your first post.

The damage cap only screws melee and ranged damage types.

Not spell casters. Those rely on SoDs to get the job done; a Wizard using Magic Missile isn't really doing that good of a job. If he's tossing out Sleep or Colour Spray, he's making sure that the enemies are killed.


The lack of resurrection abilities is also bad for a D&D game. You can do no ressing, but not in D&D. At level 10 and up Death becomes a sort of Status Effect that lasts until the fight is over and your party can get you fixed up.

Also, resurrecting a character will make said character indebted to the other party members and in fact the whole ressurecting procedure can be a whole aside of roleplaying in an of itself.

Of course, if just duplicating a freshly killed character with point-buy and just popping them into the party is fine in your game; that works as well.


The mechanic on dying characters seems like an unnecessarily complex system. You could use the system that is already in place. Also, your system doesn't take into account people who have the Die Hard feat and creatures who have that Ability. They don't fall unconcsious when at -1 HP, and keep fighting until killed.


Your removal of Teleport is... understandable, but flawed. As well you haven't taken any sort of effort to explain the mechanical and story effects that a lack of Teleport would have in the game.

The option that I use for my own games comes from the Dungeonomicon:

Quote
The Constructanomicon:

"How does that even stay up?"

Perhaps the most important question surrounding Dungeons and Dragons is the question why there are Dungeons and Dragons. When you think about it, that's pretty weird.

Dungeons:  By the gods, why?

Alright, we know that you love dungeons.  We love them too, despite the fact that we’re pretty sure there is no good reason for the silly things.  The average D&D game world is frankly incapable of the technology or manpower needed to build vast underground complexes.  I mean, look at our own world history: aside from a single underground city in Turkey and a couple of pyramids and tombs, the ancient world took a pass on underground life.  Even the old excuse of “Wizards can magic it up and they do it because its defensible” is a bit lame considering that we are talking about a world with teleport and burrowing and ethereal travel; being underground is actually a liability since its harder to escape and people can drop the roof onto you, not to mention the incredible costs involved in doing it even if magic is available.

So here is what we suggest:  dungeons have an actual magical purpose.  By putting anything behind at least 40’ of solid, continuous material (like solid walls of dirt, stone, ice, or whatever, but not a forest of trees or rooms of furniture) the area is immune to unlimited-range or “longer than Long Range” spells like Scrying and transportation magic like teleport, greater teleport, the travel version of gate, and other effects.  You can use these magics inside a dungeon, but you also stopped by a 40’ solid, continuous material in a Line of Effect; this means you can use these effects inside a dungeon to bypass doors and walls, but entering and leaving the dungeon is a problem, and parts of the dungeon that have more than 30’ of material in the way between your position and the target of your effect will be effectively isolated from your position.

In summary, in a best-case scenario you can transport yourself to a dungeon, then bust in the entrance and enter the dungeon, then transport yourself to the place you want to be inside the dungeon.  In a worse-case scenario, the dungeon designer will have built the dungeon in such a way that only someone aware of the layout can take full advantage of unlimited range or transportation spells like teleports and Scry, or even that most or all areas if the dungeon are inaccessible to these effects. 




Of course, there are exceptions.  The idea of permanent portals, gates, or teleport circles are just too common in DnD and too fun to just abandon.  Permanent effects will continue to regardless of materials in the way, and will be the premier way to enter and leave dungeons, as well as the best way to move inside a dungeon.

By incorporating these changes in your DnD world, you are ensuring that players actually explore rooms in your dungeons that you have painstakingly built, you avoid all the problems with Scry-and-Die tactics, and you'll find that players actually care about dungeon geography.  It also adds a bit to suspension of disbelief in your setting, which is only good for a cooperative storytelling game. 



Disenchanting.

Honestly... I don't think that that's the best way to look at items.

The whole trade of magical items aspect of D&D is probably one of the more interesting ones.

You don't trade a real magical item (read: magical items that are worth more than 15k gold) for something as worthless as gold. You only trade it for magical items.

Now here's the thing. Only adventurers would trade items with each other.

What's to stop them from, you know, just killing the other creatures that have said items?
Logged

Name kept out of inertia. Thirteen years and counting.
Pages: « 1 2
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.11 | SMF © 2006-2008, Simple Machines LLC Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!