Any sufficiently prepared Wizard is indistinguishable from an adventuring party

[Sunic_Flames]

God damn, Giacomo, Sunic, and BS in a clusterfuck of idiocy.  The hell has this forum come to?

Hi Welcome

This. Clown Monks are not important, as they have automatically invalidated themselves.

You may wish to address "clown monk" questions elsewhere - I guess this is not the thread to do it.

- Giacomo

Since you are making clown Wizards instead, I'd say it is.

...Who the fuck makes a caster with something other than their casting stat as their primary stat?

[Sir Giacomo]

Since you are making clown Wizards instead, I'd say it is.

...Who the fuck makes a caster with something other than their casting stat as their primary stat?

Well, in a functioning group this can be the norm - but when doing a solo campaign as in this setting shown by Endarire, maybe you should not put all your eggs in one basket (and there is the Easter pun for you .. )
After all, a high casting stat is good, but a super-high casting stat is not always yielding the same return on investment as a very high stat that boosts your initiative, a weak save, your AC, stealth skills, ranged touch attacks etc.

- Giacomo

[Solo]

Well, in a functioning group this can be the norm - but when doing a solo campaign as in this setting shown by Endarire, maybe you should not put all your eggs in one basket (and there is the Easter pun for you .. )
After all, a high casting stat is good, but a super-high casting stat is not always yielding the same return on investment as a very high stat that boosts your initiative, a weak save, your AC, stealth skills, ranged touch attacks etc.
- Giacomo

Oh, so that's why the Monk isn't MAD.

[AleksanderTheGreat]

The DM backed down from the challenge before I even explained my plan.

I consider it a victory.

I think this is our signal that this thread served its purpose. Maybe a mod should lock it? Because this discussion isn't going anywhere.