http://brilliantgameologists.com
May 22, 2013, 08:07:16 AM *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
News: These boards are now READ ONLY. We've started over! So don't try posting here. Go here www.minmaxboards.com
 
   Home   Help Search Members Login Register  
Pages: « 1 2 3 4 5 6 »
  Print  
Author Topic: Looking for replacement players for City of the Spider Queen campaign  (Read 4314 times)
0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
Kaelik
Donkey Kong
****
Posts: 704


Email
« Reply #80 on: April 19, 2011, 11:57:05 PM »

If I'm allowed to, mostly because this was originally just a plain 3.0 campaign, I'll probably change a couple of things up, but I'm not looking to optimize my character too much. Originally I was just going to go Scorpion Samurai/Wizard/Eldritch Knight, but it turns out the knight wasn't available in 3.0. I'll wait until I get accepted in. If the party's willing to take in a fifth, I'll revise my character a bit.

Whether I'm willing to accept a 5th is dependent on the fifth.

I don't see any reason to bring in someone who is going to noticeably outclassed, and create inter party conflict because of that fact. If your PC can't bring something serious to the table that no one else does, my character will straight up have no respect for them and treat them like dirt. I can hold that back for party unity, but I don't want to have to.
Logged
kevin_video
Organ Grinder
*****
Posts: 4833



Email
« Reply #81 on: April 19, 2011, 11:59:49 PM »

Whether I'm willing to accept a 5th is dependent on the fifth.

I don't see any reason to bring in someone who is going to noticeably outclassed, and create inter party conflict because of that fact. If your PC can't bring something serious to the table that no one else does, my character will straight up have no respect for them and treat them like dirt. I can hold that back for party unity, but I don't want to have to.
If I come in, I'm willing to accept the help that's apparently needed to make my character a worthwhile one for the party.
Logged

I reject your reality, and substitute my own.

When God gives you lemons... it's time to find a new God.

Like D&D Freakouts? Check out this 4th Ed one.
VennDygrem
Member
Grape ape
*
Posts: 1689


VennDygrem
Email
« Reply #82 on: April 20, 2011, 12:27:52 AM »

Throw out everything you know about City of the Spider Queen as a campaign, because as Oslecamo's mentioned, he's re-tooling it for high-power 3.5. I'm more than willing to help you boost your character, but first I would like to know what concept you're operating on. It seems like you're mostly working with making a gish; is that accurate?

Just so you have an idea of what the current party make-up is, we've got Kaelik as Elemental Siphon (a Tome-level elements-based pseudo-caster he created, by my understanding, heavy on battlefield control with some decent damage and utility options), myself as a Force Potentate (force-effect based pseudo-caster created by Kaelik as well, also heavy on BFC though slightly more geared toward touchless combat maneuvers such as tripping, grappling, etc.; also has trapfinding and other utility abilities), Risada as a homebrew Marshal (melee combat and party buffing), and Thistledown as a homebrew Ogre Mage racial class (Gish bruiser).

Right now, we lack a full caster (with the ogre mage gish coming closest), and any buffing that stacks, enhances, or complements Risada's would be appreciated; Furthermore, we don't have anyone devoted to high damage output (by 4E parlance, a 'striker'), though that's really the least of our concerns I imagine. I'm sure others can find other holes in our capabilities.

I certainly wouldn't want to shoehorn you into filling the gaps as much as Kaelik might, though he's the one who organized the game in the first place so besides Oslecamo being DM and having final say, Kaelik's word is what goes. I'd like to help you make the character that best fits what you want to play while still contributing something to the group that we lack, and I believe that's entirely possible.
Logged

kevin_video
Organ Grinder
*****
Posts: 4833



Email
« Reply #83 on: April 20, 2011, 01:36:43 AM »

I was mostly just looking to contribute. Figured on a melee fighter with basic healing, and a ranged weapon just in case my character needed it. Thought there'd already be a full caster, either arcane or divine. So I'm pretty much open to any suggestions.
Logged

I reject your reality, and substitute my own.

When God gives you lemons... it's time to find a new God.

Like D&D Freakouts? Check out this 4th Ed one.
Kaelik
Donkey Kong
****
Posts: 704


Email
« Reply #84 on: April 20, 2011, 11:54:28 AM »

I certainly wouldn't want to shoehorn you into filling the gaps as much as Kaelik might,

I don't care about filling gaps. I care about terrible characters. If someone says "I don't really think I need to optimize my character much" and they have Fighter and Ranger on their character sheet, then what I know is that I'd rather have a level 1 Dragon Shaman follower than that character, not the least of which because the follower doesn't steal XP. I don't believe in roles and gaps to fill. I believe in powerful murdering hobos.
Logged
VennDygrem
Member
Grape ape
*
Posts: 1689


VennDygrem
Email
« Reply #85 on: April 20, 2011, 01:39:04 PM »

@Kaelik: 'powerful murdering hobos' is now my phrase of the day.
@kevin I'll look something up for you once I get out of work in a couple hours, and we'll see what we can put together.
Logged

kevin_video
Organ Grinder
*****
Posts: 4833



Email
« Reply #86 on: April 20, 2011, 01:39:51 PM »

@kevin I'll look something up for you once I get out of work in a couple hours, and we'll see what we can put together.
Sounds good to me.
Logged

I reject your reality, and substitute my own.

When God gives you lemons... it's time to find a new God.

Like D&D Freakouts? Check out this 4th Ed one.
kevin_video
Organ Grinder
*****
Posts: 4833



Email
« Reply #87 on: April 22, 2011, 12:13:00 AM »

After discussing things, and looking at options, I'm stepping down. Sorry. I'm not one to optimize myself to the point of a being able to create a powerful murdering hobo. That's beyond my capability.
Logged

I reject your reality, and substitute my own.

When God gives you lemons... it's time to find a new God.

Like D&D Freakouts? Check out this 4th Ed one.
Thistledown Thurbertaut
That monkey with the orange ass cheeks
****
Posts: 259


Unseelie Fae


Email
« Reply #88 on: April 22, 2011, 12:45:36 AM »

Sorry to hear that Kevin.  On the other hand, this IS a CharOp board....
Logged
VennDygrem
Member
Grape ape
*
Posts: 1689


VennDygrem
Email
« Reply #89 on: April 22, 2011, 01:28:19 AM »

Actually, this is the Play-by-Post board. The Char-Op board is appropriately titled "Min/Max It!" but is separate from this one. This one's just populated by most of the same people on the Min/Max board.
-----
Definitely a shame to see you step down, Kevin, but you've got to do what you've got to do. On the plus side, after helping you with build ideas, I think I know what I'd want to play if my current character bites the dust. Big Grin
« Last Edit: April 22, 2011, 01:31:09 AM by VennDygrem » Logged

Thistledown Thurbertaut
That monkey with the orange ass cheeks
****
Posts: 259


Unseelie Fae


Email
« Reply #90 on: April 22, 2011, 05:58:24 AM »

Er...well yeah that's what I meant.  I guess to me I consider this all just one forum. Shrug:

Logged
WarlockLord
Domesticated Capuchin Monkey
**
Posts: 92


Email
« Reply #91 on: July 07, 2011, 09:45:47 PM »

Seeing as your fifth bowed out, would it be ok if a drow wizard/anima mage stepped in, using the Savage Progressions base race?
Logged
oslecamo
Grape ape
*****
Posts: 1940



« Reply #92 on: July 09, 2011, 07:01:03 PM »

If you're still interested, your character idea sounds good enough.
Logged

WarlockLord
Domesticated Capuchin Monkey
**
Posts: 92


Email
« Reply #93 on: July 10, 2011, 02:26:42 AM »

Very well then.  As it is 1:26 AM where I am, he shall be posted later.

EDIT: Here he is.  He uses one piece of Dragon material (the Aligned Spellcaster variant from Dragon 357, which allows you to trade your familiar to give an alignment descriptor to all your spells and you get a +1 CL bonus against those of the opposite alignment.  Us being what we are, Manzazu is aligned with EVIL.

http://www.myth-weavers.com/sheetview.php?sheetid=311967

So is he OK?  Anyone have objections to his build/whatever?  Fellow party members, do you believe he can render sufficient assistance?

He's probably just a member of Bre'gan De'arthe or whatever Jarlaxle's merc group is called who got sent down to do the dirty work. 
« Last Edit: July 10, 2011, 04:08:11 AM by WarlockLord » Logged
oslecamo
Grape ape
*****
Posts: 1940



« Reply #94 on: July 10, 2011, 04:53:24 AM »

I'll allow that dragon option, but I'm not allowing you to retrain feats that are pre-requisite for other stuff. I'm already allowing flaws for you to get extra feats.
Logged

VennDygrem
Member
Grape ape
*
Posts: 1689


VennDygrem
Email
« Reply #95 on: July 10, 2011, 12:47:53 PM »

Yeah, having a wizard on board is useful, though I'm not sure what your specialty is. Many of your spells appear to be buffing you, and some of the rest seem situational, but otherwise you bring a decent selection of spells. As Osle mentioned, you'll have to do something about those retrained feats, and besides losing out on a caster level, taking a level of Binder nets you the full suite of abilities from the vestiges you're able to bind, which while I'm sure you're focusing much more on the wizard side, can still offer some rather nice bonus abilities. However, you'll be losing out on that persisted greater blink spell until you hit Anima Mage 5 again. Actually, you can enter Anima Mage sooner, so you shouldn't need Wizard 5. There must be some other way to fit Extend Spell in other than that bonus feat slot, and then you'd more-or-less have the same basic build you've got, including Vestige Metamagic.
Logged

WarlockLord
Domesticated Capuchin Monkey
**
Posts: 92


Email
« Reply #96 on: July 10, 2011, 03:16:50 PM »

Not sure how that'd work, getting in sooner (as I need 4 intimidate ranks) w/o caster level loss.

How are we interpreting the Anima Mage +1 to Binder Level clause?  The way I interpret it is that you get Soul Binding (anima mage expressly says you gain soul binding as though you'd gained a level of binder), knocking those feats offline, which is why I take Improved Binding level 6 (when I first enter anima mage) so the soul binding provided by the class gives the prereqs and the feats themselves are useless (unless we argue that since I didn't actually take a binder level, the feats arn'y KO'd.).  As such, they aren't so much prerequisites as waste of space former prerequisites which aren't required anymore.

I will, of course, change the build, but I don't have the time to do it right this second so I'll do it later.
Logged
oslecamo
Grape ape
*****
Posts: 1940



« Reply #97 on: July 10, 2011, 03:51:31 PM »

Anima mage handbook here explains that altough those feats allow you to enter the Prc, they won't advance your binding.  I'll side with the CO community on this matter. You can still grab Improved Binding to classify right away with a single binder level.
Logged

WarlockLord
Domesticated Capuchin Monkey
**
Posts: 92


Email
« Reply #98 on: July 10, 2011, 05:33:55 PM »

I've read the handbook.  It doesn't explain anything, it looks like that guy is Making Shit Up.

But I don't mean to be a pain in the ass, so I think I'll just have my guy go for the Shadow Adept from Players Guide to Faerun instead.  That ok with you?

Edit: Here is another link to him, with anima mage levels changed to shadow adept & feats redone.

http://www.myth-weavers.com/sheetview.php?sheetid=311967
« Last Edit: July 10, 2011, 06:07:12 PM by WarlockLord » Logged
oslecamo
Grape ape
*****
Posts: 1940



« Reply #99 on: July 11, 2011, 06:25:05 PM »

Crunch looks good, now just needs a backstory.
Logged

Pages: « 1 2 3 4 5 6 »
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.11 | SMF © 2006-2008, Simple Machines LLC Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!